Where the Business and IT Conversation Starts
IDC Circle Blogs

Jul09
22

Driving for Efficiency in Product Life-Cycle Management

Posted by: Chris Holmes in MI Blog @ 3:19 PM

Tags: , , , ,

Author
Chris Holmes

The results of the Manufacturing Insights' latest survey show an interesting trend that manufacturing companies within the region are focusing their improvement efforts on driving efficiency in the product life-cycle area. That is companies are looking to apply waste reduction efforts, such as lean manufacturing ideas, to their product development processes.

Engineers the world over are expensive, and this has not gone unnoticed by the management within companies, especially with R&D and engineering staff numbers being reduced as companies try to save costs.

This, in turn, is leading to a focus on the efficiency of the product development process. Companies want to ensure that the engineers they employ are productive. They are effectively 'engineering' during the work day rather than focusing on administration or other non-value adding activities.

How do companies gain control and visibility over the development process? This is where the suite of product life-cycle management (PLM) tools comes into play. We have the tools that simplify and remove the administrative burden – things like product information management (PIM) systems, the increase in the use of collaboration tools from desktop videoconferencing through to shared markup. We can also see the increased use of computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools to support the efficiency of the engineering process through product, manufacturing and in-service simulations. Finally, we have the project management tools to monitor the progress of development projects as well as analyze the data to gain insights into the status and health of the development process. Such insights are useful as it gives us a better idea of the development costs and risks such as skills bottlenecks.

The next two to three years will see some major restructuring of the product development process as companies focus on waste reduction and increasingly turn to technology to facilitate lean product development.

Currently rated 2.0 by 14 people

  • Currently 2/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Permalink | Trackback | RSS comment feedComments (0) | RSS comment feedComments RSS | 


May09
06

"We didn't know what we were talking about!" - Supply Chain Optimization

Posted by: Chris Holmes in MI Blog @ 7:40 PM

Tags: , ,

Author
Chris Holmes
A recent article in the Engineering and Technology Magazine of the Institute of Engineering and Technology was devoted to discussing the cost of failure. Of particular relevance was a discussion on Wedgewood, a British pottery firm that failed early this year. The article cites the companies manufacturing and supply chain director discussing what made them move production to China. The opening statement was 'we didn't know what we were talking about.'  The 2003 decision to move production to China was based on gut feel. All Wedgwood management knew was that the free-on-board cost of a china made plate was US$0.70 cents compared to USD $3.00 (at today’s exchange rate). However the cost did not include the costs for goods inward inspection, storage and handling, extra inventory incurred on the 43 day voyage from China to the UK , handling at ports, working capital, administrative costs, duties, quotas and the additional bureaucracy required to mange the process. Chinas yield was two-thirds the UK production plants yield of 96%. The UK was far more responsive and could put right incomplete orders or wrong quantities in hours, but because of the extended supply chain the cost estimate to put things right cost the company USD $100,000 a year. The result - the cost of production doubled within 6 months of starting production in China. On 5th January 2009 the company was placed into receivership. Since then parts of the company has been acquired and a plan put in place to move the company back to profitability.

What is important to learn from this story is the need to consider the entire supply chain, all the processes involved in making that chain work, and the possible exceptions that might arise. I have heard many other stories of companies who have purely looked at the cost of production when moving manufacturing to Asia but have not considered the total landed costs - and then there is the issue of responsiveness, as in the Wedgwood example - how fast can an order be rectified. If your supply chain stretches around the world - it is not something that can be rectified in a few hours...With these decisions requiring input the use of computer simulation models is a good way to start. The whole process of building the model requires that the supply chain be mapped and will give valuable insight into all the various steps of the process. The opportunity to then try various 'what-if' scenarios can also give valuable insight into where to place manufacturing plants....Obviously the simulation will give you an idea for decision making, when you set up the plant there will be more issues to consider as 'no plan survives contact with reality' but at least there will be some basis for the decision that were made and that you know what you are talking about.

Currently rated 4.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Permalink | Trackback | RSS comment feedComments (0) | RSS comment feedComments RSS | 

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Calendar

<<  May 2013  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789