Where the Business and IT Conversation Starts
IDC Circle Blogs

Mar13
17

CRO Survey: Investment Considerations and Top Enterprise Risk Initiatives: What's in Store for 2013?

Posted by: Li-May Chew in A.F.S. @ 3:05 AM

Tags: , ,

Author
Li-May Chew

 

Changing global dynamics call for executives to astutely manage their risk profiles to ensure that their financial institutions not only survive but thrive in this "new normal" environment — an environment where bankers have to deal with a climate of protracted slow growth and hyper competition. With various forces converging to push risk management into the consciousness of senior bankers across Asia/Pacific, we conducted a CRO Survey polling 40 banking Chief Risk Officers (CROs) and their deputies from across 11 Asia/Pacific nations to shed light on core risk initiatives and the associated business drivers.

Herein, IDC Financial Insights found that despite the weak economic environment, purse strings continue to be somewhat loose when it comes to technology investments for risk, with only a negligible 2.7% of respondents expecting weaker risk budgets in 2013 (See Figure 1). On the contrary, 62.1% forecast rising technology budgets for risk management, with more than a third projecting at least a 7% increment in spending in 2013.

 Figure 1: Investment Growth in Risk Management Solution, 2013

 

Q.   Our institution's capex and opex on risk management implementation for 2013 will grow by:

Source: IDC Financial Insights' CRO Survey, January 2013

Our findings reveal that while capital remains precious, IT and risk offices at financial institutions are cognizant of the need to establish a fine balance between driving business strategies and enhancing risk management controls. In order of importance, banks in Asia/Pacific are investing on credit analytics, enterprise data management, and enterprise risk dashboards and reporting — and because all the tools are irrelevant without the right people to utilize and manage them — on skilled risk management staff, which is becoming a rare commodity in Asia/Pacific these days. This brings our forecast for total risk spending on risk technologies by Asian banks to US$7.65 billion in 2013.

Other nuggets of information uncovered from the interviews include the fact that as the region continues to reel from the aftereffects of the financial turmoil, all respondents' credit risk teams are continuously enhancing the quality of their portfolio by upgrading their credit risks infrastructure, processes, and risk management tools. Meanwhile, 53.8% of those surveyed claim to have instituted enterprise risk management (ERM) on a companywide level. (Although I would think this is subjective, depending on how they define ERM.) In any case, crossing lines of business with enterprise risk management strategies, talent, and technical infrastructure is a necessity to ensure that the full range of risk is being actively managed and resources are being applied as effectively as possible.

What I found surprising — and obviously good news for risk management vendors out there — is that a substantial 77.2% of respondents agreed that risk vendors could possibly (though not necessarily) provide a greater level of risk analytic ability than could be found internally and, as such, are increasingly open to outsourcing to risk management specialists. If so, are they transitioning toward the utilization of cloud-based risk solutions? While this trend is increasingly prevalent in other regions, only 30.8% of the surveyed are sufficiently comfortable to do so at the present moment, citing data privacy and security regulations as core inhibitors.

As banks across Asia/Pacific scramble to remain ahead of the risk management curve, plug gaps within their risk management framework, and exploit the disruptive third platform technologies of Big Data and analytics, cloud computing, social business, and mobility, 2013 will witness their CROs continuing to elevate risk management to a high strategic priority internally. Risk executives will further engage in new dialogues with the Chief Investment Officers to ensure that risk is integrated with all business technology decisions, seek out new tools for risk management to cope with the "new normal" environment, and invest in programs to ensure that risk management skills, code of ethics, and compliance obligations are developed and understood across all strata of the institution.

A lot seems to be on the plate of CROs at Asian banks for 2013, and we at IDC Financial Insights will continue tracking these developments — so watch this space!

For detailed survey findings covering the Asia/Pacific banks' CROs' investment considerations and process instituted for financial and enterprise risk management, opinions on the role of risk vendors, their top enterprise risk initiatives for 2013 and expectations around changes in risk budgets going forth the next 12 months, plus action items for risk executives and risk management vendors to consider, please refer to "Business Strategy: Asia/Pacific CRO Survey — Risk Management in the "New Normal" Environment" (Doc # FIN239279, February 2013).

 

Currently rated 1.7 by 32 people

  • Currently 1.71875/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Permalink | Trackback | RSS comment feedComments (0) | RSS comment feedComments RSS | 


Aug11
08

Operational Risk Management: Have appropriate vendor management strategies

Posted by: Li-May Chew in A.F.S. @ 4:11 PM

Tags: , ,

Author
Li-May Chew

As incidences of operational risk intensify, their substantial cost and ramifications bring to light the undeniable correlation between operational risk management and sound business practice. There is thus an analogous need for Asian bankers to accelerate their implementation of operational risk management solutions.

As such, I analyzed the principal operational risk solution vendors participating in the Asian market and the solutions they provide in a recent report, with the intent to equip banks with useful information to assist them in narrowing down their search for the most appropriate operational risk solution vendor.

In that document, I suggested the following vendor management pointers:

  • Investigate the vendors' current offerings and future expansion path: Examine the future plans of vendors to ensure that they offer tools that effectively cover an institution’s existing portfolio and also accommodate further updates. This is crucial to ensure that the organization does not inadvertently select a solution that caters to the current risk management situation, but fails to grow with the bank in the future.
  • Explore vendors' footprint of reference clients; gravitate towards those dedicated to the market via continuous commitments in research and development (R&D): For instance, a substantial clientele list implies a risk management solution that is tried and tested and hence, less risky.
  • Consider the size of the vendor, turnover, market share and financial stability: These factors serve as indicators of their ability to remain in operations, invest funds for innovation and research, and withstand financial catastrophes.
  • Take note of rankings that demonstrate end-user confidence in their risk solutions: Industry accolades and awards won by the vendor could be a barometer for innovation. However, these need to be recognition given to vendors based on objective, unbiased end-user polls. On the contrary, rankings given in lieu of advertising space in publications are not necessarily objective and should not carry the same weightage.

…But also look beyond merely plugging-and-playing vendor solutions

Nonetheless, to measure, monitor and mitigate risk, it is necessary for banks to look beyond mere dependence on operational risk vendor technologies. They need to invest in improving operational processes and undertake regular risk assessment exercises to ensure the existence of adequate risk coverage levels. As operational risk is highly correlated to people risk, in addition to having the appropriate systems, solutions and processes, institutions should be cognizant of cultural attitudes towards risk, and empower managers to link risk management to long-term strategic business objectives.

As a matter of fact, because of the huge amount of data that flow out of an operational risk management program and the far-reaching tentacles of operational risk, projects can easily suffer all of the worst IT implementation problems. This may include scope creep, too many managers, or, conversely, a lack of strong senior-level advocates. Without a strong focus and a reliable project manager, investments in operational risk management will never produce demonstrable results.

Note: More information on the operational risk solution vendors in Asia/Pacific is available in "Landscaping the Asia/Pacific Operational Risk Solution Vendors: Who's Who in the Zoo?" (Doc #FIN229455) at http://www.idc-fi.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=FIN229455. Detailed coverage includes that for Algorithmics, IBM OpenPages, Methodware, Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications, SAP, SunGard, and Wolters Kluwer Financial Services

Currently rated 1.3 by 17 people

  • Currently 1.294118/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Permalink | Trackback | RSS comment feedComments (0) | RSS comment feedComments RSS | 

Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Calendar

<<  May 2013  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789